“Made in Canada” vs “Product of Canada”: What do these labels really mean?
By: Jason Brisebois, and Bailee Kleinhandler
With the imposition of the new U.S. administration’s tariffs on imported materials and goods, more Canadians are choosing to support local products and producers. Businesses often attempt to make this choice easier for consumers by including wording such as “Made in Canada” or “Product of Canada” (collectively referred to as “Canadian Origin Claims”) on their labels. Although this can be a powerful marketing tool, there are strict regulations concerning their use and serious legal consequences for incorrectly or deceptively marketing a product using these claims.
Understanding Canadian Origin Claims
In Canada, there is no obligation to make “Made in Canada” or “Product of Canada” claims in regards to a product; rather these claims are voluntary. However, if a business chooses to make such a claim, it must be accurate and comply with all applicable regulations.
Canadian Origin Claims are primarily enforced by the Competition Bureau (the “Bureau”), through the Competition Act, R.S.C, 1985, c. C-34, which directly prohibits false or misleading representations (including Section 52 and Section 74.01). The Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-38 (Section 7) and the Textile Labelling Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. T-10 (Section 5), also contain provisions which prohibit false or misleading representations regarding specific product types.
With respect to food-products, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (the “CFIA”) is responsible for enforcing the rules under the Food and Drugs Act and the Safe Food for Canadians Act, S.C. 2012, c. 24.
What are the key difference between “Made in Canada” and “Product of Canada”?
The primary difference between these two claims is primarily the amount of Canadian content a product contains.
“Product of Canada”
“Product of Canada” claims require at least 98% of the total direct costs of production to have been incurred in Canada. This means that all, or virtually all of the direct costs were incurred in Canada.
“Made in Canada”
The “Made in Canada” claim has a lower threshold than the “Product of Canada” claim, meaning that only at least 51% of direct costs must have been spent in Canada. If you choose to use a “Made in Canada” claim, you must determine whether a qualifying statement is required to ensure clarity and precision. If it is required, the qualifying statement must be tailored to accurately reflect the specific details of the content that is imported. For example, “Made in Canada with imported parts” or “Made in Canada from domestic and imported ingredients”.
While businesses are encouraged by the Bureau to include clear and specific qualifying details, businesses should be cautious of using broad terms like “produced” or “manufactured” without necessary precision as these terms may be interpreted by consumers as equivalent to a “Made in Canada” claim.
Direct costs refer to the expenses that are directly incurred in producing or manufacturing goods. According to the Bureau’s guidance, these costs include:
- expenditures on materials incurred by the producer/manufacturer in the production or manufacturing of the goods; and
- expenditures on labour incurred by the producer/manufacturer that relate to the production or manufacturing of the goods and can reasonably be allocated to the production or manufacturing of the goods.
What factors will the Bureau consider?
When assessing whether a Canadian Origin Claim is accurate or misleading, the Bureau will look at several key factors, including the overall message the claim conveys to consumers, where the product underwent its final “substantial transformation”, and where the majority of direct production costs were incurred.
The term “substantial transformation” has been defined by the CFIA to refer to a significant change in the form, appearance, or nature of a product as a result of processing or manufacturing, such that it becomes a new product with a different identity that is commonly recognized as distinct by consumers.
Ultimately, the Bureau will consider the general impression that is being conveyed by a representation. As described in the Bureau’s enforcement guidelines, this means that the Bureau will consider “the general impression conveyed through a combination of words, visual elements, illustrations and overall layout that may alter the plain meaning of a representation”.
What about food products?
As discussed above, the CFIA is responsible for enforcing claims as they relate to food products sold in Canada. Similar to the guidelines under the Competition Act, a business is not obligated to make a Canadian Origin Claim. However, once they do, they must comply with the Food and Drugs Act (Section 5(1)) and the Safe Food for Canadians Act (Section 6(1)).
“Product of Canada” claims should be used for products where nearly all the contents are Canadian-sourced. While some minor non-Canadian materials can be included (such as spices, minerals, or flavouring), they must be minimal and should make up less than 2% of the total product. Packaging materials sourced from outside of Canada do not affect the eligibility of a “Product of Canada” claim, since the focus is primarily on the origin of the ingredients and manufacturing, not the packaging.
In contrast, food products may still use a “Made in Canada” claim even if most of the ingredients come from other countries, as long as the final “substantial transformation” happens in Canada and the label includes a qualifying statement clearly indicating that the product includes imported content.
What about symbols?
Often times, the packaging of products will contain a symbol of Canadiana, such as the Canadian flag or a maple leaf. The inclusion of these symbols and logos, whether intentional or not, can create the impression that the item was “Made in Canada” or a “Product of Canada” amongst consumers. Including such symbols may result in the Bureau holding the business to those standards.
In order to overcome this, it is important to include a clear qualifying statement, to describe the actual origin of the product. This statement should be placed in close proximity to the logo or symbol being used.
What are the penalties and consequences for non-compliance?
The penalties for a false or misleading Canadian Origin Claim will depend entirely on whether the conduct falls under the civil or criminal provisions of the Competition Act.
Under the civil penalties included in the Competition Act, violations can lead to:
- For corporations, the penalty for a first time violation is up to the greater of:
- $10 million ($15 million for each subsequent violation); and
- three times the value of the benefit derives from the deceptive conduct, or if that amount cannot be reasonably determined, 3% of the corporation’s annual worldwide gross revenue.
- For individuals, the penalty for first time violation is up to the greater of:
- $750,000 ($1 million for each subsequent violation); and
- three times the value of the benefit derived from the deceptive conduct, if that amount is reasonably determined.
Under the criminal penalties of the Competition Act, an individual found to have made false or misleading claims, on summary conviction, may face a maximum penalty of a fine up to $200,000, imprisonment for a term of one year, or both. On a conviction of indictment, an individual may be subject to a fine at the court’s discretion, imprisonment for a term of up to 14 years, or both.
Conclusion
Ultimately, Canadian Origin Claims can boost consumer trust and brand loyalty, especially during these uncertain times, but only if they are made responsibly. There is no obligation to label your product as “Made in Canada” or as a “Product of Canada”, but once a Canadian Origin Claim is made, it must meet the standards outlined above.
If you have any concerns or questions relating to Canadian Origin Claims, Sotos LLP can assist.
Please contact Jason Brisebois at 416.572.7323 or jbrisebois@sotos.ca, or Bailee Kleinhandler at 416.572.7311 or bkleinhandler@sotos.ca to discuss your Canadian Origin Claims.
- Government of Canada, Competition Bureau, “Product of Canada and “Made in Canada” Claims (2025) at s 3.1 [Bureau Guideline].
- Ibid.
- Ibid at s 3.2.1.
- Ibid.
- Bureau Guidelines, supra note 1 at s 3.2.2.
- Ibid at s 2.1.
- Government of Canada, Competition Bureau, Origin claims on food labels (2023) [Food labels].
- Bureau Guidelines, supra note 1 at s 3.1.1.
- Ibid.
- Food labels, supra note 7.
- Ibid.
- Food labels, supra note 7.
- Bureau Guidelines, supra note 1 at s 4.
- Ibid.
- Ibid.